Discriminatory pricing is an issue that’s quietly affecting shoppers across the country. While many believe prices are fixed and consistent, research and lawsuits suggest that’s not always the case. In fact, several major retailers have been accused of charging customers different prices based on demographics, location, or shopping behavior. These pricing strategies may appear subtle, but they can create serious concerns about fairness and transparency. Here are five retailers that have come under fire for discriminatory pricing practices.
Image Source: Pexels
1. Amazon
Amazon has been criticized for using dynamic pricing, which adjusts costs based on browsing history, location, and even whether a customer is using a mobile device. While dynamic pricing is legal, some argue it results in discriminatory experiences. Two people may see completely different prices for the same product depending on their shopping patterns. This makes it difficult for consumers to know if they’re getting a fair deal. The lack of transparency has led to calls for regulatory oversight.
2. Target
Target faced scrutiny when shoppers reported that online prices were lower than in-store prices for identical items. Some customers found that they were charged more at brick-and-mortar locations despite store pickup being available for less. While Target says its pricing varies by region and sales promotions, critics argue that this model disadvantages those without access to online shopping. The practice has triggered complaints on social media and raised concerns about digital access inequality.
3. Walgreens
Walgreens was part of a pricing controversy involving so-called “location-based price adjustments.” Customers discovered that products scanned at higher prices in certain neighborhoods, even when those same products were on sale elsewhere. Advocacy groups questioned whether these pricing differences disproportionately impacted lower-income or minority communities. Walgreens denied any discriminatory intent but pledged to reexamine its pricing model. The case sparked broader debate over fair retail practices.
4. Staples
Staples was found to adjust its online prices based on the distance between a customer and the nearest physical store. The closer a person lived to a store, the lower the online price they saw—while rural customers often paid more. A media investigation uncovered this tactic, prompting backlash from rural shoppers. Though Staples said the model was designed to reflect logistical costs, the practice was ultimately discontinued after public criticism.
5. Home Depot
Some shoppers have accused Home Depot of using ZIP code-based pricing on their website and app. Critics claim that certain urban areas consistently show higher prices than suburban counterparts. While this hasn’t resulted in any legal action, it has led to increased public scrutiny. Consumers are encouraged to price-check using different devices or locations to identify inconsistencies.
As technology enables more personalized pricing models, retailers are being urged to adopt transparent policies that don’t unintentionally discriminate. Shoppers, meanwhile, should stay alert, compare prices, and use incognito browsing when researching products online. What seems like a small difference in price can reflect much bigger issues in fairness.
Read More
Banning Sugary Foods for SNAP Recipients: A Step Toward Health or Discrimination?
5 Grocery Stores That Are Scamming You at Self-Checkout (And Where to Shop Instead)
