Returning a purchased item should ideally be a smooth, customer-friendly process. However, many shoppers encounter return policies or procedures that seem designed to create friction, turning a simple task into a “nightmare” scenario. These difficult experiences can range from confusing rules and excessively short return windows to unexpected fees and poor customer service interactions. While retailers need policies to prevent abuse and manage inventory, overly restrictive, costly, or cumbersome processes damage customer loyalty and goodwill. Based on common complaints and consumer frustrations reported around early 2025, here are six types of return policy practices that shoppers frequently cite as major headaches.
1. Extremely Short Return Windows
One of the most common frustrations is an overly brief period allowed for returns or exchanges, sometimes as short as 7, 14, or 15 days from purchase (as noted in some policies for specific items like electronics or activatable devices). This is particularly problematic for gifts bought in advance or for online orders where shipping time eats into the window. Finding out you missed the deadline by a day due to a restrictive timeframe feels unfair. More customer-centric policies offer 30, 60, or even 90 days (or longer with loyalty programs/store cards), providing reasonable flexibility. Policies demanding items be postmarked back within 14 days of receipt (as seen with some online consignment/resale platforms) also create tight turnarounds.
2. Unexpected or Opaque Restocking Fees
Certain retailers, especially for categories like electronics, furniture, or special orders, charge a “restocking fee” if an item’s box has been opened, even if the product is unused or defective. This fee, often a percentage of the purchase price (e.g., 15%) or a flat rate (e.g., $45-$50 for wireless devices, according to some reports), significantly reduces the refund amount. Consumers often feel penalized for simply opening a product they decided against or found unsuitable. While stores argue this covers inspection and handling, the lack of clear disclosure before purchase and the fee itself are major pain points that discourage legitimate returns.
3. Stringent Requirements for Original Packaging Condition
Image Source: 123rf.com
While returning an item with its original packaging is generally expected, some policies are excessively strict about the condition of that packaging. Demanding packaging be in pristine, unopened, or near-perfect condition is often unrealistic, especially for items in sealed plastic blister packs or boxes that naturally get minor tears during careful opening. Denying a valid return (of an unused, intact product with all accessories) solely because the box has minor cosmetic damage feels punitive and out of touch with the reality of unpacking goods.
4. Offering Only Store Credit Instead of Refunds
Policies stating “store credit only” for returns – especially for non-clearance items returned within the standard window with a receipt – are widely disliked. This forces the customer to spend their money back at the same retailer, limiting consumer choice and making them feel less like a true refund. While sometimes understandable for final sale items or returns without proof of purchase (where a merchandise credit might be offered), applying this broadly to regular returns feels restrictive and less customer-focused than offering a refund to the original payment method.
5. Charging Fees for Return Shipping (Mail-In Returns)
For online purchases, the convenience of returning items by mail can be offset by unexpected return shipping fees. Some retailers deduct a fixed amount (e.g., $7.50 – $9.95, based on examples) from the refund to cover the cost of the return label, even if the return timeframe is met. While free return shipping is a major perk offered by many online retailers, those that charge for it, particularly without making it obvious upfront, create dissatisfaction. This fee eats into the refund and penalizes customers for not living near a physical store or choosing the mail-in option.
6. Inflexible Policies on Worn/Used Items (Combating “Wardrobing”)
While retailers understandably need to combat return fraud like “wardrobing” (using an item once and returning it), overly strict interpretations can penalize legitimate customers. Policies stating items must be unworn, unwashed, with original tags perfectly attached can sometimes be used to deny returns for items tried on briefly or where a tag accidentally came off. While fraud prevention is necessary, policies perceived as overly suspicious or inflexible, especially when combined with staff judgment calls on whether an item appears “used,” can lead to frustrating denials for customers attempting honest returns due to fit or preference issues. Recent reports indicate retailers are tightening these aspects.
Customer-Friendly Returns Build Loyalty
Retailers navigate a fine line between facilitating legitimate returns and preventing fraud. However, policies featuring very short windows, hidden fees, unrealistic packaging demands, store-credit-only rules, return shipping charges, and overly rigid interpretations of “used” items consistently generate shopper frustration. Stores with clear, transparent, reasonably flexible, and fair return policies often foster greater customer trust and long-term loyalty. A smooth, respectful return experience can strengthen the customer relationship, while a negative one can drive shoppers away permanently.
What are your biggest frustrations with retail return policies? Have you encountered any “nightmare” return situations? Share your experiences and what you think makes a fair return policy below!
Read More
The Controversial Practice of Reselling Returned Grocery Items
